Российское региональное отделение

Европейской ассоциации научных редакторов 

 Методические рекомендации по мультидисциплинарной научной коммуникации:

1.
Systematic and Open Identification of Researchers and Authors: Focus on Open Researcher and Contributor ID.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4234910/pdf/jkms-29-1453.pdf

2.
Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049215/pdf/CroatMedJ_55_0271.pdf

3.
The first Russian seminar on science communication.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009718/pdf/CroatMedJ_55_0171.pdf

4.
Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944419/pdf/CroatMedJ_55_0061.pdf

5.
Researchers and editors at the heart of science communication.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923991/pdf/jkms-29-161.pdf

6.
Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893982/pdf/CroatMedJ_54_0600.pdf

7.
Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3763098/pdf/jkms-28-1270.pdf

8.
Open access: changing global science publishing.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3760666/pdf/CroatMedJ_54_0403.pdf

9.
Choosing the target journal: do authors need a comprehensive approach?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3744695/pdf/jkms-28-1117.pdf

10.
Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708092/pdf/jkms-28-972.pdf

11.
Peer review in scholarly biomedical journals: a few things that make a big difference.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708091/pdf/jkms-28-970.pdf

12.
Authorship and contributorship in scholarly journals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3677992/pdf/jkms-28-801.pdf

13.
Bibliographic databases: some critical points.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3677991/pdf/jkms-28-799.pdf

14.
Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00296-012-2582-2

15.
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3428827/pdf/CroatMedJ_53_0386.pdf

16.
Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00296-011-2276-1

17.
Familiarizing with science editors' associations.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3243314/pdf/CroatMedJ_52_0735.pdf

18.
Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00296-011-1999-3

19.
Biomedical journal editing: elements of success.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118726/pdf/CroatMedJ_52_0423.pdf

20. 

Educating science editors: is there a comprehensive strategy?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295079/pdf/CroatMedJ_55_0672.pdf

21.

Rewarding Peer Reviewers – Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366954/pdf/jkms-30-360.pdf

22.

Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication

http://www.jkms.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/0063JKMS/jkms-30-1010.pdf

23.

Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication

http://www.jkms.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/0063JKMS/jkms-30-1545.pdf

 Международные ассоциации редакторов:

European Association of Science Editors
http://www.ease.org.uk/

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

http://www.icmje.org/

Committee on Publication Ethics

Тел./Факс: (499) 502-10-04

e-mail   This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ,   This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it